GMAT备考范文

theconclusionofthisargumentisthattechnologicalinnovationaswellastheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesignwillbeminimizedinthefuture.theauthorslineofreasoningisthattheimpositionofstrictsafetycodesonpublicbuildingsinhibitstheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesign,becausetheydiscouragetechnologicalinnovationwithinthebuildingindustry.furthermore,thestrictnessofthecodesgoverningpublicbuildingsdiscouragestechnologicalinnovationbecausethesurestwayforarchitectsandbuilderstopassthecodesistoconstructbuildingsthatusethesamematerialsandmethodsthatarecurrentlyallowed.thisargumentisunconvincingfortworeasons.

inthefirstplace,theauthorsconclusiongoesbeyondtheevidencepresented.theevidencecitedpertainsonlytotheconstructionofpublicbuildings,yettheauthordrawsaconclusionaboutthebuildingindustryasawhole.technologicalinnovationandarchitecturalexperimentationinstyleanddesignintheconstructionofprivatebuildingsisnotprecludedbythereasonscited.consequently,intheabsenceofevidencethatsimilarproblemsbesettheconstructionofprivatelyownedbuildings,theauthorsconclusionisnotwarranted.

inthesecondplace,itisnotevidentthatthestrictsafetycodesgoverningpublicbuildingswillhavetheeffectspredictedbytheauthor.architecturalstylesanddesignarenotdictatedsolelybythematerialsorthemethodsemployedinconstruction.consequently,itisprematuretoconcludethatlittleevolutioninstyleanddesignwilloccurbecausethematerialsandmethodswilllikelyremainthesame.moreover,technologicalinnovationisnotrestrictedtotheuseofnewmaterialsandmethods.significanttechnologicalinnovationcanbeachievedbyapplyingexistingmethodstonewsituationsandbyfindingnewusesforfamiliarmaterials.

第2篇：GMAT备考

theconclusionofthisargumentisthattechnologicalinnovationaswellastheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesignwillbeminimizedinthefuture.theauthorslineofreasoningisthattheimpositionofstrictsafetycodesonpublicbuildingsinhibitstheevolutionofarchitecturalstylesanddesign,becausetheydiscouragetechnologicalinnovationwithinthebuildingindustry.furthermore,thestrictnessofthecodesgoverningpublicbuildingsdiscouragestechnologicalinnovationbecausethesurestwayforarchitectsandbuilderstopassthecodesistoconstructbuildingsthatusethesamematerialsandmethodsthatarecurrentlyallowed.thisargumentisunconvincingfortworeasons.

inthefirstplace,theauthorsconclusiongoesbeyondtheevidencepresented.theevidencecitedpertainsonlytotheconstructionofpublicbuildings,yettheauthordrawsaconclusionaboutthebuildingindustryasawhole.technologicalinnovationandarchitecturalexperimentationinstyleanddesignintheconstructionofprivatebuildingsisnotprecludedbythereasonscited.consequently,intheabsenceofevidencethatsimilarproblemsbesettheconstructionofprivatelyownedbuildings,theauthorsconclusionisnotwarranted.

inthesecondplace,itisnotevidentthatthestrictsafetycodesgoverningpublicbuildingswillhavetheeffectspredictedbytheauthor.architecturalstylesanddesignarenotdictatedsolelybythematerialsorthemethodsemployedinconstruction.consequently,itisprematuretoconcludethatlittleevolutioninstyleanddesignwilloccurbecausethematerialsandmethodswilllikelyremainthesame.moreover,technologicalinnovationisnotrestrictedtotheuseofnewmaterialsandmethods.significanttechnologicalinnovationcanbeachievedbyapplyingexistingmethodstonewsituationsandbyfindingnewusesforfamiliarmaterials.

第3篇：备考资料GMAT

thefollowingappearedintheopinioncolumnofafinancialmagazine.

onaverage,middle-agedconsumersdevote39percentoftheirretailexpendituretodepartmentstoreproductsandservices,whileforyoungerconsumerstheaverageisonly25percent.sincethenumberofmiddle-agedpeoplewillincreasedramaticallywithinthenextdecade,departmentstorescanexpectretailsalestoincreasesignificantlyduringthatperiod.furthermore,totakeadvantageofthetrend,thesestoresshouldbegintoreplacesomeofthoseproductsintendedtoattracttheyoungerconsumerwithproductsintendedtoattractthemiddle-agedconsumer.

discusshowwellreasoned...etc.

sampleessay1:

theargumentthatdepartmentretailsaleswillincreaseinthenext10yearsandthusdepartmentstoresshouldbegintoreplaceproductstoattractmiddle-agedconsumersisnotentirelylogicallyconvincing,sinceitomitscertaincrucialassumptions

firstofall,theargumentignorestheabsoluteamountofretailexpenditureofmiddle-agedandyoungerconsumersdevotedtodepartmentstoreproductsandservices.althoughyoungerconsumersspendasmallerpercentageoftheirretailexpendituretodepartmentstoreproductsthandothemiddle-agedconsumers,theymightactuallyspendmoreintermsoftheabsoluteamount.

温馨提示：通过以上关于GMAT备考范文内容介绍后，希望可以对你有所帮助(长按可复制内容)。